yo. back to blog again. so cool. i went to library@orchad yesterday. this library is on my list of "must-go" libraries. although i did not find what i was looking for, i still did. let me explain. i was looking for the three book by thomas harris and anne rice's latest book, blood canticle. i found the books by harris but not the one by anne rice. apparently the national library board's website is not updated. i checked up on the book and it was still available on the day i went to the library. tsk tsk. by the way, was my last entry THAT difficult to understand? it was nothing but an extract from a storybook. don't look difficult to me at all. nothing to do now. i have completed all the homework that are realistic and reasonable. in other words, i have not done my chinese book report. i plan to copy it. yes, copy. i don't think that it's wrong because what you have to learn is in the book itself and if you really know what the book is about, there is no need for a book report. furthermore, the books that we were made to read was not a story, but stories. so how the heck are we supposed to write a two-and-a-half page book report on a story that is only about 4 to 5 pages long? perhaps some might say that it's not that difficult, but hey, look at your standard of chinese and those of others. this goes out to chen zehou in particuliar. i mean so what if he is a chinese teacher and his chinese rocks? he is a TEACHER, he is supposed to make learning creative and fun. i don't think how he is teaching is fun or creative. here we are, frantically trying our darndest to pull up our chinsese and there he is nagging and setting unreasonable standards. why the hell can't he(they) see that not all students sre made to be the best or to meet their expectations(often unreasonable) in whatever subject they teach? it's quite pissing really. we are trying our best and they are trying to break us.